Dr. Robert Malone's Explosive Revelation: mRNA Vaccines - Nobel Prize or Nobel Prize Scam? Unveiling the Horrifying Truth Behind Bioweapon-Like Injections and the Global Conspiracy to Silence Dissent.
"The idea is still solid. The idea that you can produce an immune response against a foreign protein using a gene therapy technique, any gene therapy technique. MRNA happens to be one. And, that is absolutely solid and has gone mainstream now. And it's very much akin to, live attenuated."
"It was at the core of the vaccine that I helped bring forward and is now the Merck Ebola vaccine. It's a different platform. It's another kind of recombinant virus, circular stomatitis virus. But that worked by the way, that is a nasty vaccine. It is a really reactogenic vaccine, and people line up to take it because it's Ebola."
"Big difference is the risk benefit ratio. And here, we ended up with something that's more like the flu in terms of its risk. And, the benefit associated with these products, not so much. They're really not very effective. One of the problems that existed all the way through the DNA and RNA vaccine space has been known for decades, is that they produce an interesting and different immune response that has more of a cellular component."
"So they focus obsessively on the antibodies but it's actually the cellular immune response that matters more in most of these. And it tends to come on strong and be short lived. It is not a very durable response. And what have we seen with the RNA vaccines? They aren't durable."
"You have to keep jabbing and jabbing and jabbing. And every time you do that, you expose the patient to the same risk again. So that's what has come down here. That was the whole origin of the idea. And, I abandoned it because I could not overcome the toxicity associated with formulations."
"They were incredibly inflammatory. But I was told that the group at University of British Columbia had solved that problem and that they had made new lipid preparations and formulations that made it so that the product would stay at the site of injection and the draining lymph nodes. And it didn't have all this toxicity. And it turned out that that was all a lie as you've just shown with that most recent paper looking at the bio distribution."
"But Pfizer knew it was a lie because that's shown in their early submissions to the FDA, which the f you know, Steve and myself and Brett talked about on the dark horse podcast so long ago. It's all been out there. And what's happened is every time we confront the government and the FDA and especially Peter Marks with the truth, they just deny it. And, it's it's, kind of amazing watching it happen."
"This denialism about scientific data at the same time that there's all this propaganda going around about trust the science, and I am the science and blah blah blah. Right. But the data have been there. They've been there for four years now or five years, And they haven't overcome the problems. They're just denying them. And people ask me again and again, could mRNA technology be made safe by, for instance, coming up with a different delivery system?"
"And other than these lipids, which as you point out correctly, cross the blood brain barrier and have all kinds of biodistribution issues associated with toxicity also. So, yeah, it's conceivable that one somebody someday might solve these problems. They might solve the problem of the pseudo uridine, the thing that Kariko and Weissman together with their work on creating the vaccine, got the Nobel for. The Nobel was not given for the idea or the invention. They don't even mention vaccines in their initial patents."
"The idea that the Nobel was given specifically for these vaccines and the people the role of Kariko and Weissman in enabling these vaccines. And the Nobel Prize Committee specifically said the reason they were awarding it was that it would encourage more people to get these vaccines. So let's put a pin in that. That's what that's about. It's a political award."
"And that's the Nobel prize has often been political. There's nothing new about that. You know, we all talk about Obama and the Nobel peace prize as one particular example. That's what went down. And I like to say, could RNA delivery for gene therapy and vaccines be made safe? And my response is, if pigs had wings, they could fly. It's purely speculative. It's possible. Somebody might solve the problems."
NOTE: The Newsexchange site assumes no responsibility for commenters and the content they post. As a last resort, comments are deleted or the option to comment is turned off ...
Comments 0
Date: Sat, February 15, 2025 
305 views, 
0 comments
